Most of this decision comes down to three questions: do you need limited liability, do you want the entity or the owners taxed, and will you raise external equity. A private limited company answers all three well for most businesses, which is why it dominates — but the alternatives exist for reasons, and choosing wrongly is expensive to unwind.
Choosing a Business Structure
Company, LLP, partnership, branch, VCC and others
Most of this decision comes down to three questions: do you need limited liability, do you want the entity or the owners taxed, and will you raise external equity. A private limited company answers all three well for most businesses, which is why it dominates — but the alternatives exist for reasons, and choosing wrongly is expensive to unwind.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Proposed business | [DESCRIPTION] |
| Owners | [NAMES AND RESIDENCY] |
| Any owner outside Singapore? | [Yes / No] |
| External equity investment expected? | [Yes / No / Possibly] |
| Regulated activity? | [Yes — licence required / No] |
| Expected first-year revenue | S$ [AMOUNT] |
| Employees expected in year one | [NUMBER] |
| Structure selected | [STRUCTURE] |
| Reason recorded | [REASON] |
1. The Three Deciding Questions
| Question | Why it decides | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Do you need limited liability? | A sole proprietorship and a general partnership expose personal assets without limit | If yes, you need a company, an LLP or an LP |
| Entity or owner taxed? | A company pays corporate tax; an LLP and partnership are transparent and partners are taxed individually | Affects effective rate, loss relief and how profits are extracted |
| Will you raise external equity? | Investors expect shares, classes, option pools and a familiar exit | If yes or possibly, incorporate a company — converting later is expensive |
1.1Where the answer to the third question is "possibly", treat it as a yes. Converting an LLP or sole proprietorship into a company later involves transferring the business, with tax, contractual, licensing and employment consequences, usually at the least convenient moment.
2. Comparison
5 more pages in the Word file
This is page 1 of the Word document, exactly as it appears when you open it. Fields shown like THIS are placeholders for you to complete.
These notes accompany the template and explain the drafting choices, the compliance points and the mistakes most often made with this document. They appear as a final page in the Word file, intended to be deleted before the document is executed.
Limited liability, perpetual succession, a familiar share structure investors understand, access to corporate tax treatment and incentives, and an established route to an exit. Unless there is a specific reason to choose otherwise, this is the answer for a trading business.
Investors buy shares. They expect classes, preferences, option pools, drag and tag provisions and a familiar exit mechanism. An LLP offers none of these naturally. Converting later means transferring the business, with tax, contractual, licensing and employment consequences — always at the worst moment.
An LLP’s partners are taxed individually whether or not profits are distributed, so a partner who leaves money in the business is still taxed on it. That suits a practice distributing everything and suits a business retaining earnings for growth very poorly.
Relief for a partner’s share of LLP losses is subject to restrictions including limits referable to contributed capital. Structures built on an assumption that losses flow through freely to offset other income frequently do not work as intended. Take advice first.
The owner’s personal assets — home, savings — are exposed to business debts and claims without limit. The saving in compliance cost is real but small; the exposure is not. For anything with employees, premises, customers or contracts, this is rarely the right trade.
In a limited partnership, a limited partner who participates in management can lose their limited liability. Passive investors must stay passive. This is the trap in what otherwise looks like a flexible fund-style structure.
It requires a permissible fund manager — a regulated entity — mandatory audit with no small company exemption, and directors connected to the manager. The segregated sub-fund feature is genuinely valuable for a multi-strategy fund and irrelevant to a trading company.
The branch is not a separate entity, so the foreign company is liable for everything it does. It must also file the foreign company’s own financial statements. For most groups this second point settles the question in favour of a subsidiary.
A branch is generally treated as non-resident, which affects access to treaty benefits and to incentives. Where the group wants Singapore tax residence, a subsidiary is the route. Take tax advice specific to the group’s circumstances rather than generalising.
They exist for market research and liaison, are time-limited, and may not conclude contracts or invoice. Using one to do actual business is outside its terms and easily discovered. It is a legitimate tool for a genuine assessment period and nothing more.
A resident director for a company, a resident manager for an LLP, an authorised representative for a branch. Foreign-owned businesses cannot avoid this, and where a nominee is used, note that appointments made by way of business must go through an ACRA-registered corporate service provider.
Registrable controller obligations, central filing and annual verification notices apply to companies and LLPs alike. Choosing an LLP does not reduce beneficial ownership transparency obligations.
Regulated activities frequently prescribe or restrict the entity form, and some require specific ownership or capital arrangements. Establish the licensing position before incorporating, not after — restructuring a licensed entity is materially harder.
Written key employment terms, itemised payslips, CPF for citizens and permanent residents, work injury insurance and work pass obligations apply to any employer, however small and whatever the structure. The choice of vehicle does not reduce them.
Reflects Singapore law current as of {{DATE OF USE}}. Requirements under the Companies Act 1967, the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005, the VCC framework and the branch and representative office regimes all change, as do tax rates and incentive conditions — take legal and tax advice on the structure before incorporating, particularly for a fund, a regulated activity or a cross-border group.
This is a ready-to-use template provided for convenience. Laws and requirements change, and every situation is different — please have it reviewed by a qualified professional (a lawyer, corporate secretary, or accountant as relevant) before you rely on it.