Distribution agreements raise competition law questions that most commercial contracts do not. **Resale price maintenance** — fixing the price at which the distributor may resell — is the provision most likely to cause difficulty, and it is the one suppliers most often want. Recommended prices are generally acceptable; imposed minimums are not.
Distribution Agreement
Appointment of a distributor or reseller
Distribution agreements raise competition law questions that most commercial contracts do not. Resale price maintenance — fixing the price at which the distributor may resell — is the provision most likely to cause difficulty, and it is the one suppliers most often want. Recommended prices are generally acceptable; imposed minimums are not.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Supplier | [NAME], UEN [UEN] |
| Distributor | [NAME], [registration] [NUMBER] |
| Products | [DESCRIBE] |
| Territory | [Singapore / Singapore and ______] |
| Exclusivity | [Exclusive / Sole / Non-exclusive] — see Section 2 |
| Term | [3] years from [DATE] |
| Minimum purchase commitment | [S$ ______ or ______ units per year / None] |
| Distributor buys and resells? | [Yes — distributor / No — agent, see the notes] |
| Pricing to the distributor | [Price list, less ______ per cent] |
| Resale pricing | Recommended only — the Distributor sets its own resale prices |
| Governing law | Singapore |
1. Appointment
1.1The Supplier appoints the Distributor to market, distribute and resell the Products in the Territory, and the Distributor accepts.
1.2The Distributor purchases the Products on its own account and resells them in its own name, at its own risk, and for its own profit. The Distributor is not the Supplier’s agent and has no authority to bind the Supplier.
1.3The Distributor shall not describe itself as the Supplier’s agent, branch or representative, and shall make clear in its dealings that it contracts as principal.
1.4The distinction between a distributor and an agent matters. A distributor buys and resells; an agent sells on the principal’s behalf for commission. They differ on risk, on title, on liability to end customers, and on tax treatment.
2. Exclusivity
| Model | What it means | Consider |
|---|---|---|
| Exclusive | The Supplier appoints no other distributor in the Territory and will not sell there itself | Strongest for the distributor; the Supplier loses direct sales |
| Sole | The Supplier appoints no other distributor, but may sell directly itself | The usual middle ground; reserve named accounts |
| Non-exclusive | The Supplier may appoint others and sell directly | Least commitment on both sides |
6 more pages in the Word file
This is page 1 of the Word document, exactly as it appears when you open it. Fields shown like THIS are placeholders for you to complete.
These notes accompany the template and explain the drafting choices, the compliance points and the mistakes most often made with this document. They appear as a final page in the Word file, intended to be deleted before the document is executed.
Fixing or imposing a minimum price at which the distributor may resell is the provision most likely to raise competition concerns, and it is the one suppliers most often ask for. Recommended resale prices and maximum prices are generally acceptable; imposed minimums, or recommendations enforced through pressure or incentives, are not. Clause 3.4 states the distributor’s freedom expressly.
Issuing a recommended price and then penalising discounting — by withholding supply, cutting rebates or threatening termination — is treated as price fixing in substance. If the price is genuinely recommended, discounting must carry no consequence.
Restricting the distributor from actively marketing outside the Territory is generally acceptable. Preventing it from fulfilling unsolicited orders from outside the Territory is a stronger restriction and needs more care. Clause 2.4 draws that line.
A distributor buys and resells on its own account; an agent sells on the principal’s behalf for commission. The two differ on who owns the stock, who carries credit risk, who is liable to end customers, and how the arrangement is taxed. Documents that call the party a distributor and then treat it as an agent create real confusion.
Clause 6.3 prohibits the distributor from registering the supplier’s marks, and it is worth having. It is not a substitute for the supplier registering the marks itself. A distributor holding a local registration has substantial leverage at renewal and can obstruct a replacement distributor after termination.
Where products require regulatory registration, licence or approval in the Territory, registrations held in the distributor’s name become leverage on termination and can delay a replacement by months. Clause 8.3(d) requires transfer; better still, hold them in the supplier’s name from the outset where the regime permits.
A distributor left holding inventory it can no longer sell will fight about it. Agree whether repurchase is an obligation or an option, at what price, and in what condition, at the outset. Silence guarantees a dispute at the worst point in the relationship.
Exclusivity without minimum commitments gives the distributor a locked territory with no obligation to develop it. Clause 2.3 makes exclusivity conditional on performance, with conversion to non-exclusive as the remedy — usually more useful than termination.
Exclusive appointments prevent the supplier selling directly even to accounts it already has. Sole appointments preserve that ability. Reserving named accounts in a schedule, with or without a fee to the distributor, resolves most of the tension.
Singapore has no statutory compensation regime for terminated distributors or agents. Some jurisdictions do, and a distributor operating in one of them may have rights that a Singapore-law clause does not displace. Where the territory extends beyond Singapore, take local advice.
Restraints are enforceable only so far as reasonable, and an over-broad one fails entirely rather than being read down. A twelve-month restriction confined to customers actually supplied under the agreement is defensible; a general market-wide non-compete is not.
The distributor may be liable to end customers as the supplier of record in the Territory, and may be the importer for product safety purposes. Insurance obligations, warranty handling and recall cooperation all matter more here than in an ordinary supply arrangement.
The importer of record bears import GST and duties and carries compliance responsibility. Establish who imports before agreeing delivery terms. Import GST and GST on a local supply are different mechanisms with different recovery positions.
Where the supplier is non-resident and the arrangement includes royalties or licence fees for the trade marks, withholding tax may apply. Structuring the payment purely as goods pricing avoids it; a separate royalty stream may not.
Reflects Singapore law current as of {{DATE OF USE}}. The Competition Act and its guidelines, product safety and labelling requirements, GST and withholding tax rules, and the enforceability of restraints all change — take legal advice on any exclusive or long-term distribution arrangement, and specifically on pricing and territorial restrictions.
This is a ready-to-use template provided for convenience. Laws and requirements change, and every situation is different — please have it reviewed by a qualified professional (a lawyer, corporate secretary, or accountant as relevant) before you rely on it.