Employment & HR

Executive Employment Agreement

Senior appointments carry three complications an ordinary contract does not: the executive is usually outside Part IV, often holds a directorship that does not end with employment, and is the one person whose restrictive covenants a court is most likely to enforce — and therefore the one whose covenants most repay careful drafting.

Download as Word7 pages21 KBFree

[HEADER — replace with your organisation’s letterhead, if used]

[COMPANY NAME] and [EXECUTIVE NAME]

THIS AGREEMENT is made on [DATE]

BETWEEN:

(1)[COMPANY NAME], a company incorporated in Singapore with UEN [UEN] (the "Company"); and

(2)[EXECUTIVE NAME], holding [NRIC / FIN] number [NUMBER] (the "Executive").

1. Appointment

Item	Detail
Position	[JOB TITLE]
Reporting to	[the Board / the Chief Executive Officer]
Commencement date	[DATE]
Board appointment	[The Executive will be appointed a director of the Company / Not applicable]
Place of work	[ADDRESS]
Employment Act Part IV	Not covered — the Executive is a manager or executive
Probation	[NUMBER] months / Not applicable
Notice — by either party	[PERIOD]
Work pass required	[No / Employment Pass]

1.1The Company appoints the Executive on the terms of this Agreement, and the Executive accepts.

1.2[Where a work pass is required] This Agreement is conditional on the Executive holding a valid work pass permitting employment with the Company in this role. If the pass is not granted, is revoked or expires, this Agreement terminates automatically on that date without notice or payment in lieu.

1.3The Executive warrants that entering into this Agreement and performing the duties will not breach any obligation owed to a former employer, including any restrictive covenant, garden leave provision or confidentiality obligation.

2. Duties

2.1The Executive shall [SET OUT THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABILITIES — four or five, specific to the role, not a generic list].

2.2The Executive shall devote the whole of their working time and attention to the business of the Company and its related corporations.

2.3The Executive shall not, without the prior written consent of the Board, hold any other office, directorship, consultancy or employment, whether or not for reward. Consent should not be withheld unreasonably for a non-competing non-executive role that does not affect performance — many senior candidates hold one and it is often to the Company’s benefit.

Generated from www.helionerp.com1

6 more pages in the Word file

This is page 1 of the Word document, exactly as it appears when you open it. Fields shown like THIS are placeholders for you to complete.

Notes for use

These notes accompany the template and explain the drafting choices, the compliance points and the mistakes most often made with this document. They appear as a final page in the Word file, intended to be deleted before the document is executed.

Executives are outside Part IV

Managers and executives are not covered by Part IV of the Employment Act, so the statutory provisions on hours of work, rest days and overtime do not apply. They remain employees for all other purposes: key employment terms within fourteen days, itemised payslips, salary within seven days of the period end, Central Provident Fund where applicable, and due inquiry before dismissal for misconduct. Employers sometimes assume seniority removes the Act entirely. It does not.

Employment and directorship are separate — end both

Terminating the employment does not remove the executive from the board, and removing them from the board does not end the employment. Clause 3.2 requires resignation from office on termination and takes a power of attorney as a backstop, because an executive who leaves acrimoniously and refuses to resign the directorship creates a filing problem and continuing duties. Clause 3.3 states the position expressly so nobody assumes one act does both.

A sole director cannot resign into a vacancy

Where the executive is the only director, or the only director ordinarily resident in Singapore, their departure creates an immediate compliance problem. Identify a successor before the termination takes effect, not afterwards.

This is the covenant most likely to be enforced

Restrictive covenants are enforceable in Singapore where reasonable, and seniority, access to confidential information and customer connection are exactly the factors that make them reasonable. That cuts both ways: the covenant matters more here than anywhere else in the workforce, and it is also the one most worth drafting narrowly. An over-broad covenant fails entirely — courts will not read it down.

Deduct garden leave from the restricted period

A court assesses the cumulative period the executive is kept out of the market. Stacking a six-month garden leave onto a twelve-month restraint frequently results in both being cut down. Clause 6.1 deducts garden leave, which is fairer and materially strengthens the reasonableness argument.

Consider paying for the restraint

There is no requirement to pay, but a paid restraint is easier to defend as reasonable, removes the hardship argument, and gives the Company a clean lever to release the executive by ceasing payment. Clause 6.7 is drafted so the restraint falls away if payment stops. For a genuinely senior role, this is usually worth the cost.

Ask about the executive’s existing restraints

Clause 1.3 is a warranty, not a formality. A former employer’s covenant may well be enforceable, and a company that hires knowing of one can face a claim for inducing breach of contract. For senior hires from competitors, obtain the previous contract and take advice before the start date.

Directors’ and officers’ insurance should run past departure

Claims frequently surface after an executive leaves. Clause 3.4 requires cover for a period after the appointment ends. Confirm the actual policy provides run-off cover rather than relying on the contractual promise alone, and check whether it responds to claims made after the policy is not renewed.

Agree bonus objectives, in writing, early

The single most common senior-executive dispute is over a discretionary bonus where objectives were never agreed. Clause 4.2 sets a thirty-day deadline. Where objectives are never set, the executive has a strong argument that the discretion must be exercised in their favour.

Bonus described as discretionary can become contractual

A bonus paid at a consistent level for several years, despite being labelled discretionary, may be argued to have become a term by custom. If genuine discretion is intended, exercise it visibly — vary the amount and document the assessment.

Clawback is easier to draft than to enforce

Recovering sums already paid, on which tax and contributions have been accounted for, is legally and practically difficult. Clause 4.3 is drafted for the cases where it matters most — misstatement and fraud — rather than as a general recovery right. Take advice before relying on it.

Due inquiry applies to executives too

Termination for cause on the ground of misconduct still requires a due inquiry. Boards frequently move directly to summary dismissal on the strength of a report. That is the fact pattern most likely to convert a justified dismissal into a successful claim.

The deemed exercise rule catches departing foreign executives

A non-citizen executive holding unexercised options or unvested awards on cessation or departure may be deemed to have exercised or vested them, producing a taxable gain with no cash received. Compute this before the termination and tell the executive — discovering it in a clearance directive after departure is an unpleasant surprise at a senior level.

Allow a non-executive role where it is harmless

Clause 2.3 flags this. Many strong senior candidates hold one outside non-executive directorship, and refusing it as a matter of policy costs candidates for no benefit. Require disclosure and consent, and give consent where there is no conflict.

Current as of

Reflects Singapore law current as of {{DATE OF USE}}. Directors’ duties under the Companies Act 1967, Part IV thresholds, Central Provident Fund ceilings, work pass qualifying salaries and the pending tripartite guidelines on restrictive covenants all change — have any executive agreement settled by an employment lawyer, and take separate advice on the equity and tax treatment.

This is a ready-to-use template provided for convenience. Laws and requirements change, and every situation is different — please have it reviewed by a qualified professional (a lawyer, corporate secretary, or accountant as relevant) before you rely on it.