Employment and HR

Respect at Work

Federal Decree-Law 33/2021 prohibits discrimination and harassment at work. What makes this policy work in the UAE is the workforce: many nationalities, many first languages, and many people whose residence depends on their job. **The barrier to reporting is not policy — it is fear that complaining costs you your visa.** Address that directly or the policy does nothing.

Download as Word6 pages20 KBFree
[HEADER — replace with your organisation’s letterhead, if used]

Respect at Work

Anti-discrimination, anti-harassment and reporting

Federal Decree-Law 33/2021 prohibits discrimination and harassment at work. What makes this policy work in the UAE is the workforce: many nationalities, many first languages, and many people whose residence depends on their job. The barrier to reporting is not policy — it is fear that complaining costs you your visa. Address that directly or the policy does nothing.

ItemDetail
Employer[COMPANY NAME], licence [NUMBER]
Applies toAll employees, contractors, agency staff and visitors
Reporting contacts[NAME], [EMAIL]  [NAME], [EMAIL]
Alternative contact outside the line manager[NAME], [DESIGNATION]
Languages available[LIST]
Approved by[NAME], [DESIGNATION], on [DATE]
Version and date[NUMBER], [DATE]
ReviewAnnually

1. What Is Not Acceptable

1.1The Company prohibits discrimination — treating someone less favourably on a ground protected by law, including in recruitment, pay, promotion, training, discipline and termination.

1.2The Company prohibits harassment — unwanted conduct that violates a person’s dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading or offensive environment.

1.3The Company prohibits sexual harassment, including unwanted physical contact, sexual comments, requests for sexual favours, and the display or circulation of sexual material.

1.4The Company prohibits bullying — repeated behaviour that intimidates, humiliates or undermines.

1.5The Company prohibits victimisation — treating someone badly because they raised a concern or supported someone else who did.

BehaviourExamples
DiscriminationExcluding a nationality from a role or a shift pattern; different pay for the same work without objective justification; refusing training on assumptions about someone’s background
HarassmentMockery of accent, religion, appearance or nationality; jokes at a group’s expense; isolating someone from work conversation
Sexual harassmentUnwanted touching; persistent comments about appearance; sexual images; conditioning a work benefit on a personal relationship
BullyingPersistent unwarranted criticism; setting someone up to fail; shouting; public humiliation
VictimisationRemoving hours, changing shifts, threatening a visa, or excluding someone after they complained

1.6The test is the effect on the person, not the intention of the speaker. "It was a joke" is not a defence, and it is the most common response received.

Generated from www.helionerp.com1

5 more pages in the Word file

This is page 1 of the Word document, exactly as it appears when you open it. Fields shown like THIS are placeholders for you to complete.

Notes for use

These notes accompany the template and explain the drafting choices, the compliance points and the mistakes most often made with this document. They appear as a final page in the Word file, intended to be deleted before the document is executed.

Name the visa fear explicitly

In a workforce where residence depends on employment, the barrier to reporting is not the absence of a policy — it is the belief that complaining costs you your visa. A policy that does not address that directly will not be used, and the resulting silence will be misread as the absence of a problem. Section 2 exists for this reason and should not be softened.

Retaliation carries a real remedy

Dismissal because an employee raised a legitimate complaint may amount to arbitrary dismissal with compensation of up to three months’ salary in addition to other entitlements. Say so in the policy — it tells employees the protection is not merely a promise from the employer.

Issue it in languages people actually read

A policy circulated in English to a workforce that reads Hindi, Urdu, Tagalog, Malayalam or Arabic has been distributed, not communicated. Translate it, deliver induction in those languages, and record which was used.

Effect, not intention, is the test

The most common response to a complaint is that it was a joke and no offence was meant. That is not a defence. Stating the test in the policy saves the argument being had from scratch in every investigation.

Do not move the complainant

Interim measures are necessary but they must not fall on the person who complained. Changing the complainant’s shift, desk or reporting line is experienced as a penalty and it deters everyone watching. Move the other party or change reporting lines instead.

Sanctions must come from the permitted statutory list

Even where a harassment finding is entirely correct, imposing a penalty outside the statutory list — an unpaid suspension, a pay cut, a punitive transfer — creates a claim. Get the finding right and then get the sanction right.

Check back after the process ends

Retaliation usually begins quietly once attention has moved on — hours reduced, exclusion from meetings, a poor review. Scheduled follow-up at four and twelve weeks catches it, and its absence is why complainants say the process made things worse.

Managers must act on informal disclosures

A concern raised in a corridor conversation is still a concern. A manager who waits for a formal written complaint has failed to act, and the organisation is on notice from the moment the manager knew.

Do not promise absolute confidentiality

A serious allegation cannot be investigated without the person complained of learning of it. Promising secrecy and then breaking it destroys trust more thoroughly than being honest at the start about what will happen.

Review the register for patterns

One complaint is an incident. The same individual or the same team appearing repeatedly is a pattern, and nobody sees it unless someone deliberately looks. A quarterly review of the confidential register is the highest-value control in this policy.

Watch pay and promotion for indirect discrimination

Discrimination in the UAE workplace is more often structural than explicit — nationality-linked pay bands, roles closed to certain groups, shift patterns allocated by background. An annual review of pay and promotion decisions surfaces what no complaint will.

Contractors and agency staff are in scope

Harassment by or towards contractors, agency workers and visitors affects your workplace and your employees. The policy applies to conduct in your workplace regardless of who employs the individual.

Keep records properly and separately

Investigation notes, accounts, the decision and the reasoning need retaining, and sensitive personal data — which this is — should be held separately with restricted access under the applicable data protection regime.

The Workplace Fairness direction of travel

Regional practice is moving towards more prescriptive workplace fairness obligations. A company with a genuine policy, real reporting routes and evidence of use is positioned for that; one relying on a document nobody has read is not.

Current as of

Reflects UAE law current as of {{DATE OF USE}}. Federal Decree-Law 33/2021 has been amended, and provisions on discrimination, harassment, permitted disciplinary penalties, arbitrary dismissal compensation and the MOHRE complaint process change — confirm the current position with MOHRE or a UAE employment adviser, and note that DIFC and ADGM apply their own codes.

This is a ready-to-use template provided for convenience. Laws and requirements change, and every situation is different — please have it reviewed by a qualified professional (a lawyer, corporate secretary, or accountant as relevant) before you rely on it.